Customs
Just as was at the beginning of the Order, the Carthusians
have continued to adjust their observances by customs,
admitting nothing that was first proven and sanctioned
by experience. The various adaptations have also
focused most often on very accessory details. Carthusian
life, completely remote from the outside world, stands
above contingencies and, broadly, remains the same.
Solitude
We read in the brief (cited by Tromby, vol.
II, App. I, p. LX) addressed to him by Urban II
of Benevento, in 1091, the third year of his pontificate:
"Dear son Bruno, who lives with our Person, working on
the preparation of councils which should be celebrated
soon, you have told Us that, in accordance with the
requirements of the Institute you founded, you must live
only in the deserts and solitary places, not in camps
and populated centers".
Authorship
The influence of Saint Bruno in the progressive
organization of the Carthusian life spans 17 years, from
1084 to 1101. The constant tradition of the order is that
Guigues I would have in 1127, only put in writing the
customs originally introduced either directly by Saint
Bruno himself or by Landuin under his direction. Guigues,
however, seems to say in the prologue to his customs: it
is the bishop of Grenoble, is it written, who compelled
him to write the first official customs of the hermitage
of Chartreuse. He admits having become long overdue in
accomplishing this task, not seeing its necessity, and not
recognizing himself the merit or ability required for such
a task. The title "Consuetudines Domus Cartusiae"
explains all the work, Guigues does not say what he wants
to be done, he puts down in writing what has been
practiced up until then. He is not a legislator, he is a
witness, he notes, and so the formula that comes back most
often is "consuevimus hoc agere". Who is the
first author of the Carthusian customs? It is Saint Bruno
himself. (La Grande Chartreuse by a Carthusian,
Grenoble, 1930, p 41).
Sources
Among the reasons which have been invoked by Guigues for
delaying the composition of the customs, he first
mentions: "It is that we believed that almost
everything we used to do religiously here, was contained
either in the Epistles of the blessed Jerome, in the
Rule of the blessed Benedict, or in other writings by a
recognized authority". It is clear from this
passage, writes D. Le Masson, how freely Saint Bruno and
his successors acted when they had to select and organize
a way of life. They let themselves be guided by the spirit
of prudence, without tying themselves to any particular
rules or constitutions which had once been made to
regulate the various monastic orders both from the Orient
and Occident. Saint Bruno did not actually select any "modus
vivendi" which had not already been praised by St.
Jerome, St. Benedict and others in their writings, but he
did not want to oblige himself thereby to observe their
rules. It is merely to gather, to compose, as a spiritual
bee, honey and wax, very well his own (Disciplina,
p.55, PL., 152.298). Guillaume d'Ivrea declares
that the Statuta are drawn in part from the
Rule of St. Benedict, letters of St. Jerome, conferences
or Lives of the Desert Fathers, works of Cassian, and
other Fathers of the Church. Why the Carthusians could not
adopt, as is, any pre-existing rules, is because of the
special blend of solitary and common life that composes
their lives. Saint Bruno probably inspired himself of the
Rule of St. Benedict, but he took from it only what was
suited for solitaries.
1st prescription
The 1st of 21 prescriptions that would have been
composed by Bruno and Landuin is conceived as such: "It
is the Holy Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ with the
Catholic interpretation of the Doctors of the Church
that will serve rule to all Carthusians; it will also be
the living examples of monastic life, given by the
fathers who have preceded us in the eremitical life, or
of (perfect) observance of the evangelical counsels
given by the patriarchs of the religious orders".
Originality
From the different forms of monastic life which
existed before him, Bruno clung to none: neither to those
of completely independent hermits, nor to any of the
cenobites following a common life, nor to that of
anchorites, who before conducting a solitary life, were
first formed in a monastery. Bruno inaugurated a fourth
way to live in the desert. The novelty was that a
predominant part of solitary life was united with a
minimum threshold of cenobitic life to make the Carthusian
hermit profit from the most sought after benefits of
common life, without compromising his solitude. This ideal
where the cenobitic life joins the eremitical life, not
only without essentially affecting it, but also to remove
from it its hazards, has the further advantage that it
does not require going through a monastery to be formed to
the necessary virtues of solitude. The aspirant to
eremitical life can enter directly the Carthusian desert
when he leaves the world, he will find comprehensive
training, both active - in the old sense of the word
(ascetic) - and contemplative, and the relevant
opportunities to exercise the virtues of both the cenobite
and the hermit. As much the cenobitic life than the
eremetical life have been returned to their original
purity. The Carthusian life, although it should be
considered eremitical because of the prominence and
greater dignity of its eremitic element, is composed of
solitary life and common life. In that Saint Bruno was not
strictly a reformer nor a successor, he was to a very
large extent, a creator.
Simplicity
The most characteristic feature of the spiritual
physiognomy of Saint Bruno is simplicity,
understood in the sense of unity, and lack of complication
in the soul, loving only God. To an acute degree, Saint
Bruno felt the nostalgia of the divine; he has traveled in
this world, relieved of all that clutters, going straight
to the point, his only desire fixed on God. The simplicity
of his spiritual sight, the unity of his life, his
complete detachment, his contempt of all earthly things,
inspired Bruno's funeral roller enrollment no.126 from the
Monastery of St. Vaast d'Arras: "Sic Pater, o Bruno,
capis Unum captus ab Uno " which could be
translated: "Taken by the One, o Father Bruno, now you
are holding the One". And the monk Gaubert of Saint
Quentin in Beauvais, said of Bruno that : "he was the
only man of his time who had renounced the world" (Title
81).
Obedience
Bruno's plan to break away from the world goes back to the
1077 vow (Letter to Raoul Verd, PL., 152,
422 C). The sacrifice he made reached its
heights when Bruno, to obey the Pope, had to
leave the desert of Chartreuse.
O Bonitas!
God's answer, clear, radiant, can be read in the soul of
the saint. To one who had sought God for God, he was given
a taste how suave the Lord is. The happiness and peace of
which he was filled, animate the two letters we have left,
from him. Joy beamed on his face: "He always had a
face as if he were in a feast", wrote the religious
of Calabria, after his death (PL, 152, 554 B).
On his lips, one word kept coming up: "O Bonitas!"
which has been called "the alleluia of the desert".
It was the custom of solitary elders to have these words
full of meaning, which were like the breath of their
souls, which they continually repeated. Bruno had long
accustomed himself to contemplate the attributes of God
through His goodness. We read at the beginning of his
Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans: "Divinitas id
est Bonitas" (PL, 153, 24 C) "Divinity
who is Goodness". We love to find this custom in
the founder of an order, which many centuries before Saint
Margaret Mary, will be the propagator of the devotion to
the Sacred Heart (cf.Month
of the Sacred Heart by former Carthusian authors by
Dom Cyprian Boutrais, 3rd ed., Toulouse, 1886).
Saint Bruno's charism: Carthusians and
aspiring SBPCLC's
SBPCLC's
and Carthusians would be called to live the same (adapted)
Saint Bruno charism. Saint Bruno wasn’t always in a mountain
valley hut; he traveled to Rome, obeyed the Pope… he lived
“his” ecclesial charism in providential obedience to a duty of
state, which took him sometimes out of a greater exterior
solitude but providentially to a greater oblative interior
solitude; we as SBPCLC's are called to perfect oblative
solitude within our duty of state, fleeing voluntarily
distractions (wholesome, joyous, balanced, generous,
progressing, silent, loving: mortification) as a witness or
martyr of this charism of “God only”, which is our eternal
(anticipated) beatific life, as Lay contemplatives. In some
ways, a Lay contemplative life can be more demanding than a
Carthusian life, and in other ways a Carthusian life is more
demanding than a Lay contemplative life. All in all, each
personal human vocation is the work of the Holy Spirit.
SBPCLC's, as well as Carthusians, can have the intimate
feeling that they share in the special charism of Saint Bruno.
Carthusians follow their Statutes, and SBPCLC's are mandated
by the 11 guidelines to “follow the path” (charism) of Saint
Bruno “adapted to life in the open world” and eventually write
collegially their own customs or Statutes. So the word
“charism” is wider than the habit or the cloister of bricks
and stones; it is a “mission in the Church”, that SBPCLC’s
are, also, “called” to.
At the
heart of everything Carthusian, is...
A religious organization defined and justified by essentially
reactionary conventions which responded to constant
forensic evolution. Essentially reactionary: 'From a
spiritual point of view the sacred space of the Carthusian
community can be said to comprise three concentric circles: the
eremus (charterhouse), the cella (cel), and the
sinus (inner self). This ‘topography of solitude and
introversion’ reflects a centripetal dynamics, a movement
directed inward and towards the centre'. (The Carthusians
in the Low Countries, p. 24, forthcoming). 'Denys the
Carthusian always refers to mundus. He presents it – in
true medieval fashion – as the place of mortal, carnal (as
opposed to spiritual) human beings, a world fraught with
corruption and hazards where the devil holds sway. To
Carthusians this world, which should be spurned, not loved , is
uninhabitable. They have left it behind and sought the solitude
and seclusion of the charterhouse, the eremus, which is so
uninhabitable to worldlings' (The Carthusians in the Low
Countries, p. 62, forthcoming). Source
(‘The
Carthusians in the Low Countries’ (forthcoming), by Krijn Pansters, Tilburg
University)